Film Review

A Fanboy's Retrospective: The Earnest Cult Classic That Sabotaged Itself

Revisiting the 2009 comedy 'Fanboys'. It had a sweet premise and a stellar cast, but does the cruel, predatory humor of the early 2000s hold up today?

Odin Halvorson

02 Mar 2026 — 3 min read

Fanboys, 2009.

It is always a shame when a film gets remarkably close to being excellent, only to lose touch just before it strikes home.

It had been a long time since I sat down to watch Fanboys. At its core, it wants to be a delightfully silly film about a group of friends on the eve of the release of Star Wars: Episode I – The Phantom Menace. The premise is legendary: they decide to break into George Lucas's heavily guarded Skywalker Ranch so that their friend, who is dying of cancer, can see the film before he passes away.

A Stellar, Silly Ensemble

The movie boasts an absolutely great cast. The core group of friends is played by Sam Huntington, Chris Marquette, Dan Fogler, Jay Baruchel, and Kristen Bell.

Beyond the main crew, the film is packed with fantastic appearances. It includes a memorable turn by Danny Trejo, and a very, very silly cameo by a certain William Shatner. On paper, it has all the ingredients of a heartfelt, nerdy road-trip comedy.

But upon rewatching it today, the film suffers from two major problems.

The Cruelty of Early 2000s Comedy

The first major issue is that, for all the aspects of the film that are funny, well-conceived, and meaningful, it simply has some incredibly mean elements baked into it.

Fanboys is heavily burdened by the early-2000s cruelty and crude sexuality that marked so many popular comedy films of that specific era.

What is truly a shame is that while movies like The Hangover could have never been anything other than pathetic, Fanboys was the sort of low-budget, passionate film that had the bones to be an enduring cult phenomenon. And it might have actually gotten away with it, if not for the second major problem: It relies on lazy, offensive punchlines that actively drag down the narrative.

And the homophobia is just the tip of the iceberg.

Casual Bigotry and the "Underage" Gimmick

To fully grasp why the film fails its own earnest premise, we have to look at the casual racism, the homophobia, and the deeply creepy underage gimmicks it employs.

Throughout their road trip, the film leans on cheap, racial caricatures for easy laughs. Characters of color are frequently reduced to props or stereotypes, existing only to be the butt of a joke for our white protagonists. Furthermore, the film leans heavily into the era's obsession with "jailbait" humor—specifically through the deeply unsettling online chatroom subplot where a character is (albeit unknowingly) pursuing an underage girl.

These elements are both lazy screenwriting and, as we're clearly seeing in the Epstein era, actively dangerous.

Yet this type of humor was entirely endemic to the post-American Pie comedy landscape. Filmmakers constantly used "nerdiness" or awkwardness as a shield to excuse predatory behavior and casual bigotry. By framing these characters as harmless underdogs, the genre effectively mainstreamed and normalized a culture where racism was just "edgy humor" and preying on underage girls was treated as a wacky, acceptable rite of passage for young men. When a film tells its audience that this behavior is just "boys being boys," it reinforces a societal rot that we are still trying to scrub out of pop culture today.

The Verdict: Too Little, Too Late

I deeply wish that I could have rewatched this film and purely been able to enjoy it, because there is a genuine sweetness inherent in its core storyline (friends going to the ends of the earth for a dying buddy) that could have taken it so far.

But at the end of the day, its saving graces are simply too little and too late to make it a true classic.

Even if it was entirely right about the utter failure of The Phantom Menace.

I’m Odin Halvorson, a librarian, life coach, and fiction author. If you like my work and want to support what we do here at Unenlightened Generalists, please consider becoming a paid subscriber to our newsletter for as little as $2.50 a month!

Support us in other ways: